Tribunal allows Assessee's appeal, quashes CIT's order on unabsorbed depreciation.

The Tribunal quashed the CIT's order under Section 263, allowing the Assessee's appeal. It held that the carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation from AYs 1996-97 to 2000-01 was permissible without the eight-year limitation, in line with the amended provisions of Section 32(2) of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on judicial precedents supporting the Assessee's position, concluding that the CIT's revision was unwarranted. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 01.06.2016.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of the CIT's order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
2. Interpretation and application of Section 32(2) of the Income Tax Act regarding the carry forward and set off of unabsorbed depreciation.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of the CIT's Order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act:

The Assessee appealed against the CIT's order dated 28.03.2013, which was passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year (AY) 2008-09. The CIT had directed the disallowance of carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation amounting to Rs. 125,47,07,925/- from AYs 1996-97, 1997-98, 1998-99, and 2000-01, arguing that as per the law applicable to those years, unabsorbed depreciation could not be carried forward beyond eight years.

The Tribunal noted that for the CIT to exercise jurisdiction under Section 263, two conditions must be satisfied: (i) the order sought to be revised is erroneous, and (ii) it is prejudicial to the interests of Revenue. The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. (243 ITR 83), which held that if an Assessing Officer (AO) adopts one of the permissible courses in law, it cannot be treated as erroneous merely because the CIT does not agree with it. The Tribunal concluded that the AO's view was a possible one and thus, the CIT's exercise of jurisdiction under Section 263 was not justified.

2. Interpretation and Application of Section 32(2) of the Income Tax Act:

The core issue was the interpretation of Section 32(2) of the Income Tax Act concerning the carry forward and set off of unabsorbed depreciation. The Tribunal examined the provisions of Section 32(2) as they existed at different points in time:

- First Period (up to AY 1996-97): Unabsorbed depreciation could be carried forward indefinitely and set off against income under any head.
- Second Period (AYs 1997-98 to 2001-02): Unabsorbed depreciation could be carried forward for a maximum of eight assessment years and set off only against business income.
- Third Period (from AY 2002-03 onwards): The law reverted to the provisions of the first period, allowing indefinite carry forward and set off against income under any head.

The Tribunal referred to the Gujarat High Court's decision in General Motors India Pvt. Ltd. (354 ITR 244), which held that unabsorbed depreciation from AY 1997-98 to 2001-02, carried forward to AY 2002-03, would be governed by the amended provisions of Section 32(2) as per the Finance Act, 2001. This meant that the unabsorbed depreciation could be carried forward and set off without any time limit.

The Tribunal also noted similar rulings by the Gujarat High Court in CIT vs. Gujarat Themis Biosyn Ltd. and the Kolkata Tribunal in Bengal Tea & Fabrics Limited, which supported the Assessee's position.

Given these judicial precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the CIT's order was not sustainable. The AO's decision to allow the carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation was in line with the prevailing legal interpretations, and thus, the CIT's revision under Section 263 was unwarranted.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal quashed the CIT's order under Section 263 and allowed the Assessee's appeal, affirming that the unabsorbed depreciation from AYs 1996-97 to 2000-01 could be carried forward and set off without the eight-year limitation, in accordance with the amended provisions of Section 32(2) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal by the Assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 01.06.2016.

---