TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether input tax credit on mixed taxable and exempt turnover could be restricted by applying the formula under Rule 131(3) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 when the dealer had not obtained approval of any special formula; (ii) Whether purchases made for a research centre established by the manufacturer formed part of "business" so as to qualify for input tax credit; (iii) Whether input tax credit was admissible on an uninterrupted power supply system used for the manufacturing plant under Section 11(a)(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 read with the Fifth Schedule.
Issue (i): Whether input tax credit on mixed taxable and exempt turnover could be restricted by applying the formula under Rule 131(3) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 when the dealer had not obtained approval of any special formula?
Analysis: The statutory scheme required apportionment where inputs were used for both taxable and exempt transactions. The dealer was expected to establish the correct method for claiming partial rebate and, where the ordinary formula did not reflect the true position, to move the Commissioner for a special formula. In the absence of such approval, and where the accounts did not permit identifiable segregation of inputs on a day-to-day basis, the authorities were justified in applying the prescribed apportionment formula.
Conclusion: The issue was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether purchases made for a research centre established by the manufacturer formed part of "business" so as to qualify for input tax credit?
Analysis: The definition of "business" under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 is inclusive and extends to transactions incidental or ancillary to trade, commerce or manufacture. A research centre maintained by a manufacturer for developing or improving products has a direct nexus with the manufacturing activity and is not comparable to an independent research institution divorced from the assessee's commercial operations. The purchases for such a research unit were therefore connected with the assessee's business activity.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Issue (iii): Whether input tax credit was admissible on an uninterrupted power supply system used for the manufacturing plant under Section 11(a)(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 read with the Fifth Schedule?
Analysis: Goods in the Fifth Schedule are ordinarily outside input tax credit unless they are purchased and put to use for resale or for manufacture or any other process of goods for sale. Electrical and electronic goods used to ensure uninterrupted power for the manufacturing plant had a direct nexus with the manufacturing process. The fact that the system could be characterised as capital goods did not by itself deny credit where the goods aided production and were used in furtherance of manufacture.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The revisions succeeded only in part: the restriction of input tax credit was sustained on the mixed-input apportionment issue, but credit was allowed for purchases made for the research unit and for the uninterrupted power supply system used in the manufacturing process.
Ratio Decidendi: Where inputs are used for both taxable and exempt activities, the dealer must justify any departure from the statutory apportionment formula; however, purchases having a direct nexus with the assessee's manufacturing activity, including research and plant-support systems used in aid of production, fall within business use and may qualify for input tax credit.
TaxTMI 
