Court Orders Release of Seized Goods Under Customs Act The court held that under Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, goods must be released if no notice is issued within six months of seizure. The impugned ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court Orders Release of Seized Goods Under Customs Act
The court held that under Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, goods must be released if no notice is issued within six months of seizure. The impugned order was set aside, and the 1st respondent was directed to release the goods within two weeks. The Writ Petition was disposed of with no costs, affirming the petitioner's entitlement to the release of goods under the Customs Act.
Issues: Release of detained goods under Customs Act, 1962
Analysis: The petitioner, a regular importer of heavy melting steel scrap, imported goods via bill of entry dated 06.08.2015, which were detained on suspicion of smuggling hazardous items. Despite 100% examination confirming compliance with the declaration, the goods were not released by the respondents, leading to the filing of a Writ Petition seeking release of the goods.
The petitioner argued that under Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, if no notice is given regarding the seizure within six months, the goods must be returned to the person from whom they were seized. As the 1st respondent did not issue any notice under Section 124(a) of the Customs Act, the petitioner was entitled to the release of the goods as per Section 110(2).
In response, the respondents claimed discrepancies in the cargo, stating the actual weight was significantly lower than declared, and unauthorized items were found. An investigation was initiated into the Inspection Agency and steamer agent's roles in the matter, with directions for expeditious proceedings.
The judgment held that as per Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, in the absence of a notice under Section 124(a) within six months of seizure, the goods must be released. Consequently, the impugned order of 18.01.2016 was set aside, and the 1st respondent was directed to release the goods within two weeks from the date of the order.
In conclusion, the Writ Petition was disposed of with no costs, emphasizing the petitioner's entitlement to the release of goods under the Customs Act provisions.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
