SSI exemption turned on rural-area status; an unchallenged revenue certificate prevailed over a planning-area amalgamation notification.

The SSI exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE depended on whether the unit was situated in a "rural area" as shown in land revenue records, unless the area had been specifically notified as urban. The village was not notified as urban by the competent Government, and a Tahsildar's certificate treating it as rural remained unchallenged and unrebutted. An amalgamation notification relating to local planning areas did not, by itself, convert the village from rural to urban. The assessee was therefore entitled to the exemption, and the Revenue's challenge to the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to small scale exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE dated 01.03.2003 when its unit was situated in Anchatgeri village and whether the Tahsildar's certificate showing the village as a rural area could be disregarded on the basis of an amalgamation notification relating to local planning areas.

Analysis: The exemption notification defined "rural area" by reference to a village as shown in land revenue records, subject to exclusion only where the area stood notified as an urban area. The village in question had not been notified as an urban area by the competent Government, and the Revenue relied only on an amalgamation of local planning areas for Hubli and Dharwad. The Tahsildar, being the custodian of land revenue records, had issued a certificate treating the village as rural, and that certificate was neither challenged nor shown to be incorrect. The prior notification relied upon did not by itself convert the village from rural to urban.

Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the SSI exemption, and the Revenue's challenge to the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order failed.

---