TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether income-tax could be deducted from gratuity on the footing that the payment was made under regulations and not under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; (ii) Whether deduction of Rs. 25,000 towards damage to the employer's property was permissible under section 4(6) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.
Issue (i): Whether income-tax could be deducted from gratuity on the footing that the payment was made under regulations and not under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.
Analysis: Gratuity forms part of salary for the purpose of deduction provisions under the Income-tax Act, 1961, but section 10(10)(iii) of that Act excludes gratuity from total income up to the prescribed limit notified by the Central Government. The Court held that the exemption is attached to gratuity as such and is not confined to gratuity paid strictly under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Section 13 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 also protects gratuity from attachment, reinforcing the statutory protection.
Conclusion: Income-tax could not be deducted from the gratuity amount; the deduction was unjustified and the issue was decided against the employer.
Issue (ii): Whether deduction of Rs. 25,000 towards damage to the employer's property was permissible under section 4(6) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.
Analysis: Section 4(6)(a) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 permits forfeiture of gratuity to the extent of damage or loss caused by an employee's wilful act, omission, or negligence resulting in damage to the employer's property. On the facts, the employer had issued notice and passed an order quantifying the damage at Rs. 25,000. The Court held that the statutory conditions for deduction to that extent were satisfied.
Conclusion: Deduction of Rs. 25,000 towards damage was permissible and the issue was decided in favour of the employer.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded only to the extent of disallowing income-tax deduction from gratuity, while upholding deduction of Rs. 25,000 towards damage.
Ratio Decidendi: Gratuity is exempt from income-tax up to the statutory limit irrespective of whether it is paid under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 or under service regulations, while forfeiture to the extent of proven damage to the employer's property is permissible under section 4(6).
TaxTMI 
