1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT Ahmedabad grants stay in service tax rent-a-cab dispute</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, granted a stay in a case involving a service tax dispute related to rent-a-cab services. The appellant's delay ... Service tax stands confirmed against the appellant along with imposition of penalty of identical amount under section 78 and 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, in respect of services of rent-a-cab - in identical circumstances, the Tribunal in the case of Dharmabhakti Travels v. CCE has, accordingly, granted stay by relying upon earlier decision in the case of Kuldip Singh Gill v. β in view of above, stay is granted. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, decided to condone a 4-day delay and proceeded to decide the stay petition. A service tax of Rs. 98,135 was confirmed against the appellant with penalties under sections 78 and 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, for rent-a-cab services. The Tribunal granted stay based on previous decisions in similar cases.