Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether excisable goods manufactured by a 100% Export Oriented Unit and cleared into the Domestic Tariff Area without requisite permission were assessable under the main charging provision of Section 3(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or under its proviso.
Analysis: The Court examined the pre-amendment text of Section 3(1) and the meaning of the expression "allowed to be sold in India". It held that the proviso applied only where the goods of a 100% EOU were lawfully permitted to be sold in India in terms of the export-import policy and the relevant statutory framework. The Court relied on the earlier interpretation that permission to debond a unit was different from permission to sell in India, and that clearances made without the Development Commissioner's authorisation did not attract the proviso merely because the manufacturer was a 100% EOU. The Court also held that the later contrary view of the Tribunal could not stand in light of the binding interpretation already declared and followed in later Supreme Court authority.
Conclusion: The goods were liable to duty under the main Section 3(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and not under the proviso.
Final Conclusion: The Tribunal's view was reversed, the adjudication order was set aside, and the duty liability was directed to be recomputed on the footing that the clearances fell under the main charging provision.
Ratio Decidendi: For pre-amendment clearances by a 100% EOU, the proviso to Section 3(1) applies only to sales lawfully allowed in India under the applicable export-import scheme, and goods removed without such permission are assessable under the main charging section.