ITAT Mumbai directs fresh verification by AO, allows revenue's appeal for statistical purposes

The ITAT Mumbai found that the CIT(A)'s deletions were not fully justified and restored the matters to the AO for fresh verification. The appeal of the revenue was allowed for statistical purposes, with directions for the AO to verify the assessee's contentions and decide the issues afresh. The ITAT directed the AO to examine if the income was properly accounted for in the subsequent year and to ensure that receipts and expenditures were accurately reflected in the audited profit and loss account.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Acceptance of the reconciliation statement by the CIT(A).
2. Direction to AO not to disturb the method of accounting and deletion of the addition of Rs. 53,26,762/-.
3. Relief of Rs. 53,26,762/- without appreciating the AO's addition based on the difference between Gross Receipts as per Form 16A and P&L account.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Acceptance of the Reconciliation Statement by the CIT(A)

The CIT(A) accepted the reconciliation statement provided by the assessee, which explained the discrepancy between the gross receipts as per Form 16A and the P&L account. The assessee, a labour contractor, had received payments for labour charges and productivity allowance from two companies. These payments were not shown in the P&L account as they were contra entries, meaning the amounts received were paid back completely. The CIT(A) observed that the assessee had properly accounted for these transactions in the books of accounts, supported by invoices, bank statements, and ledger extracts.

Issue 2: Direction to AO Not to Disturb the Method of Accounting and Deletion of Addition of Rs. 53,26,762/-

The CIT(A) directed the AO not to disturb the method of accounting followed by the assessee, which was on a mercantile basis. The CIT(A) noted that the assessee had shown the income related to the transactions in the form of service charges and that the profit earned was offered to tax. The CIT(A) cited previous ITAT decisions to support the view that only the income element should be taxed, not the gross receipts. The CIT(A) concluded that the AO had no justification for adding the gross amount as income since the receipts and payments were contra entries and the income had already been admitted.

Issue 3: Relief of Rs. 53,26,762/- Without Appreciating AO's Addition Based on Difference Between Gross Receipts as per Form 16A and P&L Account

The CIT(A) granted relief of Rs. 53,26,762/- to the assessee, noting that the difference between the gross receipts as per Form 16A and the P&L account was due to the method of accounting followed by the assessee. The CIT(A) found that the assessee had consistently raised bills for March in April of the subsequent financial year, and this method had been consistently followed. The CIT(A) directed the AO not to disturb this method and deleted the addition of Rs. 4,11,234/- made by the AO, explaining that the difference was due to timing differences in accounting for receipts.

Separate Judgments Delivered by the Judges:

The ITAT Mumbai, after considering the rival contentions and the orders of the authorities below, found that the CIT(A)'s deletion of the addition of Rs. 48,71,530/- was not justified as the receipts and expenditures should have been shown in the audited profit and loss account. The ITAT restored this matter to the AO for fresh verification. Similarly, the ITAT restored the amount of Rs. 4,11,234/- to the AO to verify if the income was accounted for in the subsequent year. The appeal of the revenue was allowed for statistical purposes, with the AO directed to verify the assessee’s contentions and decide the issues afresh.

Conclusion:

The ITAT Mumbai concluded that the CIT(A)'s deletions were not fully justified and restored the matters to the AO for fresh verification, thereby allowing the revenue's appeal for statistical purposes. The AO was directed to verify the assessee's contentions regarding the incurred expenditures and the accounting of income in the subsequent year.

---