Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the declared transaction value of the imported old and used photocopier machines could be rejected and enhanced on the basis of a Chartered Engineer's report in the absence of evidence of extra consideration or any circumstance showing that the declared price was incorrect.
Analysis: Rule 3 of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007 requires acceptance of the transaction value as the assessable value unless the prescribed exceptions are established. The record did not show any allegation or proof of additional payment, flow back of money, or any other circumstance indicating that the invoice value was influenced or incorrect. The declared value was supported by the import documents and the Revenue had not first rejected the transaction value on legally sustainable grounds. In such circumstances, enhancement based only on a second Chartered Engineer's report could not displace the declared transaction value.
Conclusion: The declared transaction value had to be accepted as the correct assessable value and the enhancement was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Declared transaction value under Rule 3 of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007 cannot be rejected unless cogent evidence shows that the price was influenced by a disqualifying circumstance or was otherwise incorrect.