Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the dismissal of the statutory appeal for non-deposit of 25% under Section 62(5) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 was sustainable and whether the matter should be remanded to the first appellate authority for consideration in accordance with the governing precedent.
Analysis: The dispute was governed by the earlier decision holding that the power to grant interim protection is embedded in Section 62(5) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 and that the pre-deposit requirement is directory in nature. It was further held that the first appellate authority may, in deserving cases, waive the pre-deposit condition wholly or partly where a strong prima facie case or undue hardship is shown. Applying that binding view, the orders dismissing the appeal for non-deposit could not stand without such consideration.
Conclusion: The orders of the first appellate authority and the Tribunal were set aside and the matter was remanded to the first appellate authority for fresh consideration in terms of the earlier precedent.
Ratio Decidendi: The pre-deposit requirement under Section 62(5) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 is directory, and the first appellate authority has implied power to grant interim protection and to waive pre-deposit wholly or partly in appropriate cases.