Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the duty demand on clearance of sesame seed waste was sustainable under the proviso to paragraph 6 of Notification No. 22/2003-CE dated 21.03.2003, and whether such waste was covered as excisable waste cleared at nil rate of duty under Notification No. 23/2003-CE dated 31.03.2003.
Analysis: The proviso to paragraph 6 of Notification No. 22/2003-CE applied only where the articles, including waste and scrap, were not excisable. The notification and the departmental circular showed that waste from food industries, including waste of sesame seeds, was treated as cleared at nil rate of duty under Notification No. 23/2003-CE. Since sesame seed waste was thus not a non-excisable item, the condition precedent for invoking the proviso to paragraph 6 was absent. The very foundation of the demand therefore failed.
Conclusion: The duty demand was not sustainable and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the appeals were allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: A demand based on the proviso to paragraph 6 of Notification No. 22/2003-CE can be sustained only when the cleared waste or scrap is not excisable; where the relevant waste is covered by a notification granting nil-rate clearance, the proviso cannot be invoked.