Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the premium paid on the keyman insurance policy was allowable as a deduction and the resulting disallowance could be sustained.
Analysis: The controversy turned on the meaning of a keyman insurance policy under the Explanation below Section 10(10D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The policy had to be a life insurance policy taken by the assessee on the life of a person connected with its business. The authorities had imported a requirement of a pure insurance policy and relied on IRDA guidelines, but those requirements were not found in the statute. The reasoning adopted earlier in the connected matter was followed, holding that once the policy satisfied the statutory definition, its character as a life insurance policy was sufficient. The Tribunal also rejected the objection based on commercial expediency and assignment of the policy, and held that the expenditure was allowable on the principles already accepted in the earlier decision.
Conclusion: The premium on the keyman insurance policy was allowable and the disallowance was not sustainable; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A keyman insurance premium is deductible where the policy answers the statutory definition of a life insurance policy taken on a person connected with the assessee's business, and extraneous regulatory or prudential requirements not found in the Act cannot be imported to deny the deduction.