Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether excavators belonging to the appellant are "motor vehicles" within Section 2(28) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and are therefore liable for registration and payment of taxes under the Act.
Analysis: The question turned on the correct application of the statutory definition in Section 2(28). The Court held that the earlier decision relied upon, which dealt with classification under the Central Excise Tariff, was not determinative of the present issue because the present controversy arose directly under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Court accepted the reasoning in the decisions that had examined the definition under the Act itself and concluded that the excavators fell within that definition.
Conclusion: The excavators are motor vehicles within the meaning of Section 2(28) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and are liable for registration and payment of taxes under the Act.