Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund claim could be rejected as time-barred under Notification No. 93/2008-Cus. dated 1-8-2008 when the claim was filed under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus. dated 14-9-2007.
Analysis: The refund claim was filed under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus. dated 14-9-2007, which did not prescribe any time limit for filing the refund. The time limit relied upon in the impugned order was taken from Notification No. 93/2008-Cus. dated 1-8-2008, but that notification was held in the cited precedent to be inapplicable and not operative through subordinate legislation for the present purpose.
Conclusion: Rejection of the refund claim as time-barred was not sustainable and was set aside.