Delay in Customs Order Quashed, Rehearing Ordered for Timely Decision Making

The Bombay High Court quashed and set aside an order passed by the Commissioner of Customs due to an unreasonable delay of 16 months between the personal hearing and the issuance of the impugned order. Emphasizing the importance of timely orders following personal hearings, the court directed a rehearing and readjudication by the adjudicating officer, ensuring a fresh order is passed without influence from prior observations. The respondent committed to issuing a new order within three months, and the court accepted this undertaking, making the rule absolute with no order as to costs.

---

---

Issues: Delay in passing orders after personal hearing by the adjudicating authority.

In this judgment by the Bombay High Court, the petition challenged an order passed by the Commissioner of Customs at the Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport. The petitioner's counsel argued that there was an unreasonable delay of 16 months between the personal hearing on 5th November, 2013, and the issuance of the impugned order on 30th March, 2015. The court noted the importance of timely orders following personal hearings, emphasizing that such delays are unacceptable, especially when they impact parties financially. The court highlighted that the Revenue's orders should be passed expeditiously, and in this case, no valid reason was provided for the significant delay. Consequently, the court quashed and set aside the impugned order, directing a rehearing and readjudication by the adjudicating officer. The court mandated that a fresh order be passed after a new personal hearing, ensuring that the adjudicating authority is not influenced by any prior observations or findings. The respondent assured the court that the new order would be issued within three months, and the court accepted this undertaking. The judgment concluded by making the rule absolute with no order as to costs.

---