Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>ITAT Upholds Assessee's Right to Choose Initial Assessment Year Under Section 80-IA</h1> <h3>Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax Versus Yamuna Power and Infrastructure Ltd.</h3> Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax Versus Yamuna Power and Infrastructure Ltd. - [2016] 47 ITR (Trib) 533 Issues Involved:1. Determination of the 'initial assessment year' for the purpose of claiming deduction under section 80-IA of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. Applicability of section 80-IA(5) regarding the set-off of brought forward losses against the income of the eligible business.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Determination of the 'initial assessment year' for the purpose of claiming deduction under section 80-IA of the Income-tax Act, 1961:The primary contention revolved around the interpretation of the 'initial assessment year' under section 80-IA of the Income-tax Act. The assessee established two windmills and claimed a deduction under section 80-IA for the income earned from these wind power generation projects. The Assessing Officer (AO) argued that the initial assessment year should be the year when the business commenced operations (2004-05), thereby requiring the set-off of losses from earlier years against the income from the eligible business. However, the assessee contended that as per section 80-IA(2), they had the option to choose any ten consecutive assessment years out of fifteen years starting from the year the business began operations. The assessee chose the assessment year 2008-09 as the initial assessment year, which was upheld by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)).2. Applicability of section 80-IA(5) regarding the set-off of brought forward losses against the income of the eligible business:The AO noted that the assessee incurred losses in the initial years (2004-05 to 2006-07) and set them off against non-eligible business income. The AO argued that these losses should be notionally carried forward and set off against the income from the eligible business in subsequent years, rendering the income from the eligible business at nil and denying the claimed deduction. The CIT(A) and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) disagreed, stating that section 80-IA(5) applies from the initial assessment year chosen by the assessee (2008-09). Therefore, losses from years prior to the initial assessment year should not be considered for set-off against the income of the eligible business.Detailed Analysis:Background and Facts:The assessee established two windmills and claimed a deduction under section 80-IA for the income earned from these projects. The AO disallowed the deduction, arguing that the initial assessment year should be the year the business commenced operations (2004-05), and losses from earlier years should be set off against the income from the eligible business. The assessee contended that they had the option to choose the initial assessment year within a fifteen-year period, and chose 2008-09 as the initial assessment year.CIT(A) Decision:The CIT(A) upheld the assessee's contention, stating that the initial assessment year is at the option of the assessee and can be any year within the fifteen-year period. The CIT(A) referred to similar decisions in the assessee's case for earlier years and allowed the appeal.ITAT Decision:The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, referencing its own decision in the assessee's case for the assessment year 2010-11, where it was held that the initial assessment year is at the option of the assessee. The ITAT also referred to the CBDT Circular No. 1 of 2016, which clarified that the assessee has the option to choose the initial assessment year for claiming deduction under section 80-IA. The ITAT concluded that losses from years prior to the initial assessment year should not be considered for set-off against the income of the eligible business.Legal Precedents:The ITAT relied on judgments from the Madras High Court in Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills P. Ltd. and the Karnataka High Court in Anil H. Lad, which supported the view that the initial assessment year is at the option of the assessee and losses from prior years should not be notionally carried forward. The Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal in Shevie Exports also upheld this view.Conclusion:The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the assessee's right to choose the initial assessment year and ruling that losses from years prior to the chosen initial assessment year should not be set off against the income from the eligible business. The decision emphasized that the initial assessment year is at the option of the assessee and supported the interpretation that section 80-IA(5) applies from the chosen initial assessment year, not retrospectively from the year the business commenced operations.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found