Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the detained goods were to be released on payment of the one time tax and whether the detention was to stand subject to the petitioner's right to pursue revision.
Analysis: The detention was challenged on the footing that the consigment was accompanied by supporting documents and that the non-generation of an e-transit pass was only a technical lapse. The respondent invoked Section 72(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act on the allegation of evasion. The Court noted the petitioner's right to file revision before the appropriate authority and accepted the course suggested by the respondent, namely payment of the one time tax without prejudice to the petitioner's contentions in revision.
Conclusion: The petitioner was directed to pay the one time tax and, on such payment, the respondent was directed to release the detained goods consignment.