Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to full waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal.
Analysis: The demand related to alleged port services and the appellants contended that the department had already been informed of their activities, that service tax was being paid on the basis of the relevant Board circular, and that there was no suppression of facts warranting invocation of the longer limitation period. The matter was also stated to be covered by an earlier decision of the same Bench affirmed by the High Court, and a similar stay application in an identical dispute had already been granted full waiver. In view of the prima facie case and the limitation issue, the Bench found it appropriate to grant complete waiver of the amount demanded at the pre-deposit stage.
Conclusion: Full waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the disputed amount was stayed till disposal of the appeal.