TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Liquidated damages deductible per contract terms, CIT(A) decision upheld, revenue appeal dismissed.</h1> <h3>ACIT, Circle-1 (1), Vijayawada Versus The K.C.P. Limited Chennai</h3> ACIT, Circle-1 (1), Vijayawada Versus The K.C.P. Limited Chennai - TMI Issues:Assessment of liquidated damages claimed by the assessee in the profit & loss account for breach of contract.Analysis:The appeal was filed by the revenue against the order of CIT(A) concerning the assessment year 2009-10. The assessee, a company, declared a total income of &8377; 92,74,12,634/- and claimed &8377; 77,40,470/- towards liquidated damages for breach of contract. The assessing officer disallowed this amount, adding it to the assessee's income, stating that the liability for incomplete contracts cannot be deducted. The CIT(A), after considering the explanations and relying on a special bench decision, deleted the additions. The revenue challenged this deletion, arguing that the issue was pending before the High Court. However, the AR of the assessee supported the CIT(A)'s decision, citing previous ITAT rulings in favor of the assessee.The Tribunal examined the case laws and found that the issue of liquidated damages for breach of contract was deductible in the assessee's favor in earlier assessment years. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that the liquidated damages were deductible in the year the liability arose as per the agreement with customers. Therefore, the additions made by the assessing officer were directed to be deleted, and the appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed.In conclusion, the Tribunal affirmed that the liquidated damages claimed by the assessee for breach of contract were deductible as per the agreement terms with customers. The decision was based on previous rulings in the assessee's favor and the point of accrual of liability for such damages. The CIT(A)'s order deleting the additions was upheld, and the revenue's appeal was dismissed.
TaxTMI 