1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT Kolkata dismisses Revenue's appeal under Section 35B(2) for lack of documentation, grants modification application.</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata dismissed the Revenue's appeal for lack of required documentation under Section 35B(2) of the Central Excise Act, ... Application for modification of the Order - Respondent had not received any notice of hearing when the appeal was allowed by way of remand - neither any COD application nor any authorisation by the Committee of Commissioners for filing the appeal, as required by Section 35B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, is on record - Application filed by the Respondent is allowed - Order of the Tribunal is recalled and the Appeal of Revenue is dismissed The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata dismissed the Revenue's appeal due to the absence of a COD application and authorization as required by Section 35B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal recalled the earlier order and allowed the Respondent's application for modification.