CESTAT Kolkata dismisses Revenue's appeal under Section 35B(2) for lack of documentation, grants modification application. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata dismissed the Revenue's appeal for lack of required documentation under Section 35B(2) of the Central Excise Act, ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CESTAT Kolkata dismisses Revenue's appeal under Section 35B(2) for lack of documentation, grants modification application.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata dismissed the Revenue's appeal for lack of required documentation under Section 35B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal granted the Respondent's application for modification, recalling its previous order.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata dismissed the Revenue's appeal due to the absence of a COD application and authorization as required by Section 35B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal recalled the earlier order and allowed the Respondent's application for modification.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.