Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purpose of computing book profit under Section 115J of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the term "loss" in the proviso to Section 205(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 includes depreciation so that unabsorbed depreciation can be deducted even where the business loss is lower than the depreciation amount.
Analysis: The controlling principle applied was that "loss" under the proviso to Section 205(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 must be understood as the figure arrived at after accounting for depreciation. On that basis, the computation under Section 115J of the Income-tax Act, 1961 does not permit excluding depreciation from the loss figure in a manner that would deny deduction of the relevant unabsorbed depreciation. The Tribunal's approach of treating loss as excluding depreciation was held to be inconsistent with the binding Supreme Court ruling.
Conclusion: The question was answered against the Revenue and the deduction of unabsorbed depreciation from book profit was upheld.