TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court clarifies goods classification under Central Excise Tariff Act</h1> <h3>Precision Rubber Industries (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner Of Central Excise, Mumbai</h3> Precision Rubber Industries (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner Of Central Excise, Mumbai - 2016 (334) E.L.T. 577 (SC) Issues: Classification of goods under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985In this judgment, the Supreme Court addressed the issue of classification of goods under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The assessee, engaged in manufacturing Synthetic Rubber Aprons and Synthetic Rubber Cots, claimed that the goods were classifiable under Chapter Heading 4009.99, approved by the Assistant Commissioner. The Revenue contended that the goods should be classified under Chapter Heading 4016.99. The Tribunal, however, classified the goods under Chapter Heading 8448.00, based on a previous order in a different case involving the assessee. The appellant argued that since show cause notices were issued for classification under Chapter Heading 4016.99, the Tribunal could not have directed classification under Chapter Heading 8448.00, a new contention not raised by the Revenue before. Citing precedents, the appellant emphasized the importance of show cause notices as the foundation for levy and recovery of duty. The Court acknowledged the usual practice of allowing fresh show cause notices but due to the passage of time, decided against it in this case. Consequently, the Court set aside the Tribunal's order and remanded the matter to determine whether the goods should be classified under Chapter Heading 4009.99 or 4016.99, limiting the remand to this specific issue.This judgment primarily deals with the classification of goods under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The dispute arose when the assessee claimed classification under Chapter Heading 4009.99, while the Revenue argued for Chapter Heading 4016.99. The Tribunal, however, classified the goods under Chapter Heading 8448.00, deviating from the initial contentions. The Court highlighted the significance of show cause notices as the basis for duty levy and recovery, emphasizing the need for consistency in classification. Despite the usual practice of allowing fresh show cause notices, the Court, considering the time elapsed, refrained from permitting the Revenue to reopen proceedings for reclassification. Instead, the Court set aside the Tribunal's decision and remanded the matter solely for determining the appropriate classification between Chapter Heading 4009.99 and 4016.99, restricting the scope of the remand to this specific issue.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
