TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the requirement of pre-deposit under Section 62(5) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 is mandatory or directory and whether the first appellate authority has power to grant interim protection or waiver in appropriate cases; (ii) whether the orders dismissing the appeal for non-deposit were liable to be set aside and the matter remanded.
Issue (i): Whether the requirement of pre-deposit under Section 62(5) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 is mandatory or directory and whether the first appellate authority has power to grant interim protection or waiver in appropriate cases.
Analysis: The binding view already taken in the connected decision was applied. It was held that, even though no express power of interim protection was conferred, such power is embedded in Section 62(5) by necessary implication. The provision was treated as directory in nature, and the first appellate authority was held competent to grant partial or complete waiver of pre-deposit in deserving cases where a strong prima facie case exists and insistence on deposit would frustrate the appeal.
Conclusion: The pre-deposit requirement under Section 62(5) is directory and the first appellate authority can grant interim protection or waiver in appropriate cases.
Issue (ii): Whether the orders dismissing the appeal for non-deposit were liable to be set aside and the matter remanded.
Analysis: Since the controversy stood covered by the earlier decision and the appeal had been rejected only on the ground of non-deposit, the impugned orders could not be sustained. The proper course was to restore the matter to the first appellate authority for consideration in accordance with the principles already laid down.
Conclusion: The orders were set aside and the matter was remanded to the first appellate authority.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded to the extent that the dismissal for non-deposit was annulled and the dispute was sent back for fresh consideration under the governing pre-deposit principles.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 62(5) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 is directory, and the first appellate authority has implied power to grant partial or complete waiver of pre-deposit and interim protection in deserving cases.
TaxTMI 
