Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported software qualified as "Information Technology" software under entry 285 of Notification No. 17/2001-Cus. dated 01.03.2001 and was therefore entitled to customs exemption.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the meaning of the notification entry and its explanation, not on reclassification of the goods. The imported software was supplied along with hardware and was shown to operate with it in a manner consistent with the definition of "Information Technology" software in the notification. No contrary evidence or authentic material was produced by Revenue to dislodge the appellant's claim. The appellate authority's attempt to travel beyond the show-cause notice and reclassify the software was outside the scope of the controversy.
Conclusion: The imported software was "Information Technology" software within the notification and the exemption was available to the appellant.