2016 (4) TMI 381 - AT - Income Tax

Appellate Tribunal in Mumbai Invalidates Reassessment: Assessing Officer's Lack of Grounds and Factual Verification Emphasized

M/s. Exim Trade Links (I) Pvt Ltd. Versus Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, -6 (2), Mumbai

M/s. Exim Trade Links (I) Pvt Ltd. Versus Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, -6 (2), Mumbai - TMI Issues:1. Validity of reassessment proceedings under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. Legality of additions/disallowances made by the Assessing Officer.Issue 1: Validity of reassessment proceedings under section 147:The appeal challenged the initiation and completion of reassessment by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle - 6 (2), Mumbai, under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appellant contended that the re-opening of the assessment was based on incorrect facts, as the reasons recorded for issuing the notice were erroneous. The appellant argued that no after-sales service fee (ASSF) was paid to the Iraqi government as claimed, and the inland transportation fee was also incorrectly attributed. The appellant asserted that the reassessment proceedings lacked proper application of mind by the Assessing Officer and were initiated without valid grounds. The appellant further highlighted that objections raised by them were not addressed, and the reasons for reassessment were not adequately supported. Ultimately, it was argued that the reassessment was not covered by the proviso to section 147 and should be deemed invalid.Issue 2: Legality of additions/disallowances made by the Assessing Officer:The Assessing Officer had made additions to the appellant's income on account of alleged payments for inland transportation fees and after-sales and services fees. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld these additions, stating that the payments were made to Iraqi authorities for securing contracts in Iraq. However, the appellant contested these additions, asserting that no after-sales service fee was charged to the profit and loss account, and the transportation charges were legitimate business expenses paid in Jordan, not to the government of Iraq. The appellant argued that the additions were based on conjectures and surmises, ignoring relevant considerations. The Tribunal found that the reasons for reassessment were mechanically recorded without proper verification of facts, leading to an unjustified reassessment process. Consequently, the Tribunal annulled and quashed the reassessment proceedings and the resultant assessment order, ruling in favor of the appellant on technical and substantive grounds.In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai, comprising Shri C.N. Prasad, JM, and Shri Rajesh Kumar, AM, allowed the appellant's appeal, declaring the reassessment proceedings and subsequent additions as invalid. The judgment emphasized the necessity for proper application of mind in initiating reassessment and the importance of factual verification before making additions to a taxpayer's income.