Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to refund of Rs. 227.20 lakhs paid through PLA and re-credited in RG-23A Part II, and whether interest was payable on the refund.
Analysis: The amount had been paid in cash during adjudication and immediately taken back as credit. The earlier round of proceedings had already held the appellant entitled to utilize the relevant Modvat credit and had remanded only for verification of the refund claim. The lower authorities rejected the claim on the basis of a purported nil balance in one register, but the appellant maintained two genuine registers and the records showed that the available credit was never below the disputed amount. The Department could not produce a reliable verification report, and the factual findings relied upon in the impugned order were found to be inconsistent with the earlier adjudication record. The claim was therefore treated as a consequential refund flowing from the favourable merits decision. As regards interest, entitlement was recognized only from the date on which Section 11BB became operative, i.e. three months after its introduction.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to refund of Rs. 227.20 lakhs, with interest in terms of Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 from the permissible date.