Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit on SAD paid on imports made under the DFIA scheme was admissible in view of the retrospective amendment to Notification No. 40/2006-Customs and whether the authorities could sustain denial on a ground not forming part of the show cause notice.
Analysis: The show cause notice proceeded on the basis of condition (v) of Notification No. 40/2006-Customs, but the adjudicating and appellate authorities denied credit by relying on condition (iiia). Such a shift in the basis of demand was not permissible because adjudication cannot travel beyond the scope of the notice. On the substantive issue, Section 92 of the Finance Act, 2009 retrospectively amended and validated Notification No. 40/2006-Customs for the relevant period, substituting the condition in clause (v) with effect from 1 May 2006 to 18 February 2009.
Conclusion: The denial of credit could not be sustained, and the assessee was entitled to Cenvat credit on the import made under DFIA.