TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal against Tax Credit Denial and Penalties Remanded for Fresh Adjudication.</h1> <h3>M/s. Vishnu Paper Products Pvt. Ltd. Versus Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, The Commissioner of Central Excise, The Joint Commissioner of Central Excise</h3> M/s. Vishnu Paper Products Pvt. Ltd. Versus Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, The Commissioner of Central Excise, The Joint Commissioner ... Issues:1. Appeal against Final Order2. Eligibility of CENVAT credit and penalties3. Simultaneous availment of CENVAT credit and depreciation4. Ex parte order by TribunalAnalysis:1. The appeal was filed against the Final Order passed by the first respondent, confirming the demand of ineligible CENVAT credit and imposing penalties under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, and the Central Excise Act. The lower appellate authority upheld part of the order, leading to an appeal by the revenue on the simultaneous availment of CENVAT credit and depreciation. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority, citing the filing of revised income tax returns by the assessee.2. The Tribunal referred to a Karnataka High Court decision stating that an assessee claiming depreciation and availing Modvat Credit simultaneously is ineligible for credit. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order and restored the Order-in-Original, prompting the assessee to file an appeal challenging this decision. The hearing revealed that the Tribunal's order was passed ex parte without giving the appellant an opportunity to present their case.3. Considering the lack of opportunity for the appellant to present their contentions, the High Court set aside the Tribunal's order and remitted the matter back for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of allowing both parties to raise all available grounds. The Court directed the Tribunal to decide the issues on merits and in accordance with the law promptly.This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the issues raised in the appeal, the decisions of the lower authorities, the Tribunal's ruling, the subsequent appeal, and the High Court's intervention to ensure a fair hearing for the appellant.
TaxTMI 