Basic engineering design payment treated as capital acquisition, not royalty or technical services, so no tax withholding arose.

Payment for outright acquisition of basic engineering design documentation to set up a plant was treated as a capital asset acquisition, not as royalty or fees for technical services. The design supply arrangement was held distinct from the separate licence and technology collaboration payments, so the design fee could not be taxed as consideration for use of rights or technical services. As the work was performed India and no taxable nexus in India or permanent establishment connection was found for that payment, no obligation to deduct tax at source arose under section 195(2). The appeals succeeded and the orders taxing the design payments were set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether the payment made for Basic Engineering Design Specification / Basic Design and Engineering Package was royalty or fees for technical services and, consequently, whether tax was required to be deducted at source under section 195(2).

Analysis: The payment in question was for acquisition of basic engineering and design package to set up the plant, whereas the licence fee and other technical collaboration payments were separately identified and taxed by the assessee. The agreements for design supply and for use of technology and related rights were held to be distinct and not to form one composite arrangement for taxing the design payment as royalty or technical service fee. On the facts, the design work was treated as an outright acquisition of a capital asset, with the work performed outside India and no finding that the non-resident had a permanent establishment in India in respect of such payment. The cited precedents supported the distinction between payment for use of property rights and payment for acquisition of basic engineering/design for creation of an asset.

Conclusion: The payment was neither royalty nor fees for technical services, and no obligation to deduct tax at source arose on that amount.

Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded and the orders treating the basic engineering/design payments as taxable royalty or technical service fees were set aside.

Ratio Decidendi: A payment made for outright acquisition of basic engineering/design documentation for setting up a plant, where the related licence and other rights are separately contracted and paid for, is not taxable as royalty or fees for technical services absent a taxable nexus in India.

---