Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund claim was barred by limitation under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 when filed on 30/4/2010 for exports made on 30/4/2009, 31/5/2009 and 30/6/2009.
Analysis: The refund was claimed under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Notification No. 5/2006-CE(NT) dated 14/3/2006. For computing the one-year period, the first date of export had to be excluded under Section 9 of the General Clauses Act. On that basis, the limitation ran from 1/5/2009 and the last date for filing the claim was 30/4/2010. The claim having been filed on that date, there was no delay.
Conclusion: The refund claim was within limitation, and rejection of refund of Rs. 1,58,556/- was unsustainable; the partial rejection of Rs. 1,615/- remained undisturbed, resulting in a partly allowed appeal.