Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a unit debonding from Export Oriented Unit status to Domestic Tariff Area is entitled to take Cenvat credit of the duty paid on indigenously procured capital goods.
Analysis: The credit dispute turned on whether the amount paid at the time of debonding could be treated as excise duty for the purpose of credit under Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. The order under challenge accepted that, on a combined reading of Notification No. 22/2003-C.E. and the export policy and procedure provisions governing debonding, the amount paid on such capital goods represented duty payment and was not hit by any prohibition against credit. The Tribunal also noted that the issue was covered by an earlier decision supporting the same view.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to Cenvat credit of the duty paid on the capital goods at the time of debonding, and the revenue's appeal was rejected.