TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeals Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction under Section 35B</h1> <h3>M/s Panorama Industries Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane -I</h3> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI dismissed the appeals due to lack of jurisdiction under Section 35B first proviso to clause (a) of the Act. The ... Maintainability of appeal - Loss of goods cleared for export laying at Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC), as per Section 35B first proviso to clause (a) of the Act - Held that:- This Tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear these appeals, as has been decided by Larger Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Supercoats Industries vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane-II (2004 (9) TMI 137 - CESTAT, MUMBAI). Therefore the appeals are dismissed as non-maintainable. The appellants have liberty to file revision application before the Joint Secretary (RA) to the Government of India. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI dismissed the appeals regarding loss of goods cleared for export at CWC, citing lack of jurisdiction based on Section 35B first proviso to clause (a) of the Act. The appellants were advised to file a revision application before the Joint Secretary (RA) to the Government of India.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
