Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>ITAT remits appeal for review, emphasizes valid grounds for assessment revision.</h1> <h3>M/s Deccan Grameena Bank (Presently Telangana Grameena Bank) Versus Income Tax Officer Ward-9 (4), Hyderabad</h3> The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes, remitting the matter back to the CIT for review after the appellant submitted ... Tds u/s 194A - non deduction of tds on interest on deposits - revision u/s 263 - Held that:- the direction of the Ld. CIT to re-do the assessment is due to non-submission of the requisite details by the assessee before him. Under section 263 of the Act, CIT has wide powers but does not have unfettered discretion to revise the assessment order and the condition necessary for invoking the power must exist. The CIT can come to the conclusion of the assessment order to be erroneous if the A.O. has not made necessary enquiries before completing the assessment but to come to the conclusion that the assessment order is also prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue, he has to go through the relevant material. But since the assessee did not produce the required details, the CIT proceeded to revise the assessment order by remanding it to the file of the A.O. Now that the details are filed before us, we deem it fit and proper to admit the same and remit the issue to the file of the Ld. CIT with a direction to re-look into the matter in the light of paper book filed by the assessee. Needless to say that assessee shall be given a fair opportunity of being heard. - Decided in favour of assessee for statistical purposes. Issues:1. Revision of assessment order under section 263 of the I.T. Act for A.Y. 2010-2011.2. Non-submission of requisite details by the assessee before the CIT.3. Powers of the CIT under section 263 of the Act.4. Direction to re-do the assessment by the CIT.5. Admissibility of details submitted by the assessee before the ITAT.6. Opportunity for the assessee to be heard before the CIT.Analysis:1. The appeal pertains to the revision of the assessment order for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2010-2011 under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The appellant contested the order of the Ld. CIT which proposed to revise the assessment to determine the interest on deposits where TDS was not deducted as required by Section 194A of the Act.2. During the proceedings, the appellant's counsel highlighted that the CIT initiated the revision proceedings based on a show cause notice and requested various details regarding TDS on interest paid on deposits. The appellant explained that all branches underwent tax and statutory audits, and details of TDS were verified. However, due to the inability to provide all details to the CIT, the assessment order was set aside for revision, prompting the appellant to appeal.3. The appellant's counsel submitted a paper book containing branch-wise TDS statements for the A.Y. 2010-2011, which were not previously submitted to the CIT. The counsel requested an opportunity for the appellant to represent before the CIT, emphasizing the need for a remand of the matter to the CIT for reconsideration.4. The ITAT considered the arguments presented by both parties and noted that the CIT's direction to re-do the assessment stemmed from the non-submission of essential details by the appellant. It was emphasized that the CIT, while possessing broad powers under section 263, must have valid grounds to revise an assessment order. The ITAT highlighted that for an assessment order to be deemed prejudicial to the Revenue, relevant material must be considered. As the appellant subsequently provided the necessary details, the ITAT decided to admit the information and remit the issue back to the CIT for review, ensuring the appellant's right to a fair hearing.5. Ultimately, the ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes, indicating that the matter would be reconsidered by the CIT in light of the details submitted by the appellant. The decision was pronounced in an open court session on 24.2.2016, concluding the legal proceedings.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found