TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court dismisses tax appeals for lack of notice under section 143(2) of Income Tax Act, upholding annulment by CIT(Appeals) and Tribunal.</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Income Tax-III Versus Nirali Specific Family Trust</h3> Commissioner of Income Tax-III Versus Nirali Specific Family Trust - TMI Issues:1. Whether the reassessment order passed under Section 147 was improper and required to be cancelledRs.2. Whether the Assessing Officer should deduct indexed cost of acquisition from full value of sale considerationRs.3. Whether the Assessing Officer should allow long term capital lossRs.4. Whether the investment made in shares should be considered as stock-in-tradeRs.Analysis:Issue 1: Reassessment Order under Section 147The High Court considered whether the reassessment order under Section 147 was improper and needed cancellation. The Court referred to a similar case and noted that the question in that case arose concerning the service of notice under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, not the non-issuance of the notice altogether. The Court found that in the present case, both the CIT(Appeals) and the Tribunal had annulled the assessment proceedings due to the non-issuance of the notice under section 143(2). The Court relied on a Supreme Court judgment that emphasized the essentiality of issuing a notice under section 143(2) for any assessment under section 143(3) of the Act. The Court concluded that the omission to issue such notice is not a procedural irregularity and is not curable, thus upholding the decision to dismiss the tax appeals.Issue 2: Deduction of Indexed Cost of AcquisitionThe Court examined whether the Assessing Officer should deduct the indexed cost of acquisition from the full value of the sale consideration. This issue was addressed by the Appellate Tribunal, which directed the deduction. However, the Court's decision to dismiss the tax appeals encompassed this aspect as well, without providing a separate analysis.Issue 3: Allowance of Long Term Capital LossRegarding the direction of the Appellate Tribunal to allow long term capital loss, the Court did not delve into a detailed analysis of this issue separately. The decision to dismiss the tax appeals covered this aspect in conjunction with the overall judgment.Issue 4: Investment in Shares as Stock-in-TradeThe Court also considered whether the investment made in shares should be held as stock-in-trade. The Appellate Tribunal's decision on this matter was not discussed explicitly in the judgment. The dismissal of the tax appeals encompassed this issue without a specific analysis.In conclusion, the High Court of Gujarat dismissed the tax appeals primarily due to the non-issuance of the notice under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the importance of such notice for assessment proceedings. The Court's decision covered various substantial questions of law, including the reassessment order, deduction of indexed cost of acquisition, allowance of long term capital loss, and the classification of investment in shares.
TaxTMI 