TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Successful Appeals Against Penalties for Non-Deduction of Tax</h1> <h3>The Land Acquisition Collector Versus Addl. CIT, TDS Range, Surat</h3> The Land Acquisition Collector Versus Addl. CIT, TDS Range, Surat - TMI Issues Involved:Appeals against penalty imposed under section 271C of the Income Tax Act for non-deduction of tax at source under section 194LA for payments made against compulsory acquisition of non-agricultural land for Assessment Years 2009-10 & 2012-13.Analysis:Issue 1: Penalty Imposed for Non-Deduction of Tax at SourceIn the case of Assessment Year 2009-10, the Assessing Officer imposed a penalty of Rs. 1,68,588 under section 271C of the Income Tax Act for failure to deduct tax at source under section 194LA. The penalty was confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)). The Assessing Officer found that the deductor failed to deduct tax on payments made to landowners for compulsory acquisition of non-agricultural land, resulting in a demand raised under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Act. The CIT(A) upheld the penalty, stating that the deductor was required to deduct TDS under section 194LA but failed to do so. The assessee argued that the failure was due to ignorance of the law and that upon becoming aware, they collected the TDS from some deductees and paid the due tax. The assessee contended that there was no mala fide intention and cited precedents to support their case. The CIT(A) accepted the explanation, noting that there was no loss to the Revenue, and deleted the penalty.Issue 2: Similar Issue in Assessment Year 2012-13The same issue arose in the appeal for Assessment Year 2012-13, where a penalty of Rs. 52,810 was imposed under section 271C for non-deduction of tax at source under section 194LA. Following the reasoning applied in the earlier case, the penalty was deleted by the CIT(A) for the same reasons of inadvertent omission, lack of mala fide intention, and no loss to the Revenue.In conclusion, both appeals filed by the assessee against the penalties imposed for non-deduction of tax at source under section 194LA were allowed, with the penalties being deleted for both Assessment Years 2009-10 and 2012-13. The judgments highlight the importance of intent and compliance with tax laws, with penalties being waived in cases of inadvertent errors without mala fide intentions and where there is no loss to the Revenue.
TaxTMI 