Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 despite the land not standing in its name and the project approval being in the name of the society, and whether the assessee was merely a contractor.
Analysis: The assessee had entered into development agreements, obtained possession of the land, undertook the housing project at its own risk and cost, bore the expenditure, fixed the sale price, received the sale consideration, and retained the profit and loss of the project. On these facts, the assessee had acquired de facto ownership and dominant control over the project land and was not a mere works contractor. The factual matrix was found to be in line with the jurisdictional High Court's view that ownership of title in land is not a prerequisite for deduction under section 80IB(10) when the developer has obtained possession and executed the project as developer.
Conclusion: The disallowance of deduction under section 80IB(10) was not sustainable and the assessee was entitled to the deduction.
Ratio Decidendi: For deduction under section 80IB(10), a housing-project developer need not be the legal owner of the land if it has possession, dominant control, and bears the entrepreneurial risk of development and sale.