Tribunal Grants 80G Approval to Charity Society, Reprimands Authority for Delay

The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the appellant society, directing the competent authority to grant approval under Section 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the society was engaged in charitable activities and that the order rejecting the application was barred by limitation, as it was passed beyond the prescribed six-month period. The delay in passing the order was deemed unjust, leading to the appellant's vulnerable position.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the appellant society was engaged in charitable activities to qualify for approval under Section 80G(5)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Whether the order rejecting the appellant's application for approval under Section 80G(5)(vi) was barred by limitation.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Engagement in Charitable Activities:
The appellant society contended that the CIT erred in finding that it was not engaged in charitable activities, thereby denying approval under Section 80G(5)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appellant's counsel argued that the society's activities fell within the definition of charitable purposes under Section 2(15) of the Act. They cited previous judgments, including the ITAT 'E' Bench New Delhi in Mayo College Old Boys Association and ITAT Amritsar Bench in S. Lakha Singh Bahra, which supported the notion that institutions registered under Section 12A should be granted approval under Section 80G unless their registration was canceled. The Tribunal observed that the appellant had a subsisting registration under Section 12A, which had not been shown to be withdrawn or canceled. Thus, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant was engaged in charitable activities and was entitled to approval under Section 80G(5)(vi).

2. Order Barred by Limitation:
The appellant argued that the CIT's order rejecting the application was passed beyond the prescribed six-month limit as mandated by Rule 11AA(6) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The application was submitted on 13.06.2011, and the order was passed on 31.05.2012, which was clearly beyond the six-month period. The Tribunal noted that the CIT failed to take appropriate action within the prescribed time limit and did not consider any time consumed by the appellant during the proceedings. The Tribunal referred to the ITAT Amritsar Bench's decision in S. Lakha Singh Bahra, which held that orders passed beyond the prescribed period are not sustainable and should be considered time-barred. The Tribunal concluded that the CIT's order was indeed barred by limitation and not sustainable in law.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the appellant on both grounds. It directed the competent authority to grant approval under Section 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to the appellant society. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant had complied with all requirements and that the competent authority's delay in passing the order placed the appellant in an unjust and vulnerable position. The appeal was pronounced in the open court on 01.02.2016.

---