Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit was required to be reversed when imported and used capital goods were cleared for export under UT-1 undertaking or bond.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that export of goods may be made either under claim for rebate or under bond, and that there is no bar on removal of inputs or capital goods as such for export under bond. It further held that the instruction manual provision permitting such export was pari materia to the erstwhile Rule 57AB, and that the Board circular applied to the facts because the duty element had already been recovered at the stage of importation. On that basis, the Tribunal agreed that the department's view that only goods manufactured in India could be exported under bond was untenable.
Conclusion: Reversal of Cenvat credit was not required, and the clearance of imported used capital goods for export under bond was permissible.