Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal's direction requiring a pre-deposit of Rs. 2.35 crore along with interest as a condition precedent for hearing the appeal was excessive and required modification, and whether the dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance of that order could stand.
Analysis: The dispute before the Court concerned only the quantum of pre-deposit required for the appeal before the Tribunal. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances, the Court found that a reduced deposit would meet the ends of justice. Since the appeal had been dismissed solely for non-compliance with the earlier pre-deposit direction, the modified order necessarily required the dismissal order to be set aside so that the appeal could be heard on merits after compliance with the revised condition.
Conclusion: The pre-deposit was reduced to Rs. 50 lakhs, the order dismissing the appeal for non-compliance was set aside, and the Tribunal was directed to hear the appeal on merits after deposit of the reduced amount.