Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Tribunal allows cross objections, upholds deductions, dismisses Revenue appeals</h1> <h3>Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle-III (1), Chennai Versus M/s. Tamil Nadu Industrial Explosives Ltd</h3> Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle-III (1), Chennai Versus M/s. Tamil Nadu Industrial Explosives Ltd - TMI Issues:1. Condonation of delay in filing cross objections2. Provision for gratuity and bonus3. Treatment of insurance claim receivedCondonation of Delay in Filing Cross Objections:The cross objections filed by the assessee were initially barred by a significant limitation of 910 days. However, the Tribunal, after perusing the reasons provided in the affidavit explaining the delay, found a reasonable cause for the delay and thus condoned it in the interest of justice. The Tribunal allowed the cross objections, noting that they were filed in support of the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).Provision for Gratuity and Bonus:The Revenue challenged the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on various grounds, with two main contentions being highlighted. Firstly, the issue of provision for gratuity and bonus was raised. The Assessing Officer had added the amounts provided for gratuity and bonus to the book profit for tax computation under section 115JB of the Act. However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) disagreed, allowing the deductions based on the statutory nature of these liabilities and the accrual basis of accounting followed by the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the decision, citing relevant case laws and finding no merit in the Revenue's appeal.Treatment of Insurance Claim Received:The second issue revolved around the treatment of an insurance claim received by the assessee due to a major accident in the factory. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) had allowed the appeal of the assessee, stating that the apportionment of the insurance claim based on actual losses suffered was justified. The Tribunal concurred, emphasizing that the amounts credited to the profit and loss account were in accordance with the losses incurred and the written down value of the assets affected. The Tribunal upheld the decision, finding no fault in the Commissioner's order.In conclusion, both appeals by the Revenue were dismissed, and the cross objections filed by the assessee were allowed, supporting the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on both issues. The Tribunal pronounced the order on 29th January 2016, maintaining the decisions made regarding the provision for gratuity, bonus, and the treatment of the insurance claim received.