Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to small scale industry exemption when the cleared goods bore brand names or trade names of other persons.
Analysis: The goods and seized articles showed markings of names used by persons other than the appellants. The statements of the managing director and production supervisor, the buyers' statements, the seized goods, and the supporting documents corroborated the Revenue's case that the appellants were clearing manufactured goods with another person's brand name. The exclusion in the exemption notification applies to a brand name or trade name whether registered or not, and the requirement is only that the name or mark indicates a connection in the course of trade with another person. The communication from the Trade Marks Registry did not assist the appellants because registration was not determinative for denial of the exemption.
Conclusion: The appellants were not entitled to the exemption, and the demand, penalty, and related reliefs as modified in appeal were upheld against them.
Ratio Decidendi: SSI exemption is unavailable where the goods bear another person's brand name or trade name, even if the mark is unregistered, because registration is not necessary for the exemption bar to operate.