Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the lump sum technical know-how fee and royalty paid on domestic sales were includible in the assessable value of imported raw materials and components under Rule 9(1)(c) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the royalty and know-how payments had a sufficient nexus with the imported goods or were merely attributable to the manufacture and sale of the licensed products in India. The relevant test was whether such payments were required, directly or indirectly, as a condition of sale of the imported goods. The later Supreme Court ruling in Ferodo India Pvt. Ltd. explained that the Department must examine not only the technical assistance agreement but also the pricing arrangement to see whether the import price had been adjusted by shifting value into royalty or licence fee. Where the royalty relates only to the manufactured products and not to the imported components, and no price adjustment or other nexus is shown, inclusion in the import value is not justified.
Conclusion: The royalty and technical know-how fee were not includible in the value of the imported goods; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.