Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the matter required remand for enquiry into the issue of multiple invoices and the consignment-agent sales, and consequential reconsideration of the refund claim under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus. dated 14.9.2007.
Analysis: The appellant's explanation regarding the existence of both manual and computerized invoices for the same transaction was not accepted at the stage of final determination. The Tribunal directed the Revenue to enquire into the reason for issuance of the two invoices and to confront the result of such enquiry to the appellant. It also directed enquiry on whether the consignment agent had sold the goods through the relevant invoices, since refund could not be denied if the conditions of the notification were otherwise satisfied. The question of limitation raised by Revenue was left to be examined along with the result of the enquiry.
Conclusion: The appeal was sent back to the original authority for fresh adjudication after the directed enquiries and after granting reasonable opportunity of hearing.