Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit is admissible on the portion of input lost only by evaporation of moisture during storage and use in manufacture.
Analysis: The inputs were received in full quantity and duty had been paid on the entire weight, including moisture content. The loss complained of was only a negligible moisture loss occurring during storage or during feeding into the cement mill, and not a case of the inputs themselves being lost before use. The applicable Modvat scheme treated credit with reference to the duty-paid inputs received in the factory, and the reasoning accepted that invisible or process-related moisture loss did not justify denial of credit where the full consignment had been received and no claim was made against the supplier for the loss. The cited contrary authority on loss of inputs was distinguished because it dealt with loss of the input itself, not merely moisture content.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was held admissible on the moisture-lost portion, and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where duty-paid inputs are received in full and only moisture content is lost by evaporation during storage or processing, credit cannot be denied merely because that moisture is not physically incorporated in the final product.