Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether guar gum manufactured by the assessee was classifiable under Chapter 11 of the Central Excise Tariff as a product of the milling industry attracting nil rate of duty, and whether the duty demand and penalties could survive on that basis.
Analysis: The activity of manufacturing guar gum on job-work basis was not in dispute, but the crucial question was classification. Earlier reliance on a decision placing guar gum under Chapter 13 was displaced by later Tribunal decisions which considered that ruling, examined the scope of Chapter 13, and held that guar gum powder falls under Chapter 11 as a product of the milling industry. Those later decisions treated the earlier view as not binding and followed the Chapter 11 classification with nil duty consequence.
Conclusion: Guar gum was held classifiable under Chapter 11 with nil rate of duty, and the confirmed duty demand and penalties were set aside in favour of the assessee.