Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether layflat tubings manufactured by the assessee were marketable finished goods and classifiable under Heading 39.17 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
Analysis: The product emerged as a separate finished item after extrusion and rolling, and it was not merely in-process material. Note 8 to Chapter 39 expressly includes tubes, pipes and hoses, and specifically brings within that expression layflat tubings. The thickness of the tubing was held to be irrelevant for classification under Heading 39.17. On this basis, the product was found to fall within the cited tariff entry and the demand could not be set aside on the ground adopted by the appellate authority.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the Revenue. The layflat tubings were held to be marketable and classifiable under Heading 39.17, and the duty demand was restored to that extent.