Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 was leviable where the assessee did not pay service tax on commission received, entertained a bona fide belief regarding non-liability, and discharged the tax with interest before issuance of the show cause notice.
Analysis: The appellant had acted under a bona fide belief that service tax was not payable, particularly in view of the employer's communication and the exemption claimed under Notification No. 13/2003-S.T. dated 20-6-2003. The tax liability and interest were paid promptly before the show cause notice. In such circumstances, the imposition of penalty was considered harsh, and the Tribunal followed its earlier view that penalty should not be sustained where the liability had been discharged in time and the surrounding facts showed absence of contumacious conduct.
Conclusion: Penalty under Section 76 was not leviable and was set aside.