Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reimported goods cleared under Notification No. 94/96-Cus. dated 16-12-1996 were liable to Special Additional Duty despite the assessee having paid the amount of Central Excise duty not paid on the exported goods.
Analysis: Notification No. 94/96-Cus. granted exemption to reimported goods from basic customs duty, additional duty under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and special duty under Section 16(1) of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1996, to the extent the duty exceeded the amount indicated in the corresponding entry of the table. For goods reimported under bond without payment of Central Excise duty, the duty payable was confined to the amount of Central Excise duty not paid. Since the revenue did not dispute that the assessee had paid the central excise duty due on the goods, no further amount could be demanded. The reliance placed on Notification No. 56/98-Cus. to deny the exemption was therefore untenable.
Conclusion: The impugned demand of Special Additional Duty was unsustainable and the assessee was entitled to the exemption under Notification No. 94/96-Cus.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a reimport exemption notification limits duty to the amount of Central Excise duty not previously paid, no further Special Additional Duty can be demanded if that duty has already been paid.