Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether capital gains arising from alienation of shares in Indian companies by a resident of the United Arab Emirates were taxable in India under the Income-tax Act, 1961, in view of Article 13(3) of the double taxation avoidance treaty.
Analysis: The ruling considered Article 13 of the treaty and found that paragraph 3 governs gains from alienation of property other than immovable property or property connected with a permanent establishment, making such gains taxable only in the State of residence of the alienator. It was held that the applicant, being a resident of the United Arab Emirates, fell within that residence-based rule. The ruling also applied Section 90(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, under which treaty provisions prevail where they are more beneficial than the Act, and therefore the fact that the gains might otherwise be taxable under domestic law did not alter the treaty position.
Conclusion: The capital gains from alienation of shares were held not taxable in India and taxable only in the United Arab Emirates.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a tax treaty specifically assigns taxing rights over capital gains to the State of residence, and Section 90(2) makes the treaty beneficial to the assessee operative over the domestic Act, Indian taxing provisions yield to the treaty allocation.