Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>High Court Bombay sets aside order in writ petition for failure to consider material, violating natural justice.</h1> <h3>CENTURY TEXTILE & IND. LTD. Versus THE UNION OF INDIA</h3> The High Court Bombay set aside the order dated 21-7-2008 in a writ petition, directing the Commissioner (A) to rehear the application for dispensing with ... While recording finding in favour of revenue, Commissioner (A) has failed to consider material which was relevant for making an order- commissioner not considered the judgment referred by petitioner and has not given any reasons why the case of the petitioner is not covered and how that judgment is distinguishable – impugned order is set aside - therefore, application filed by the petitioner for dispensing with the pre-deposit is restored to file of the Commissioner (A) The High Court Bombay set aside the order dated 21-7-2008 in a writ petition, directing the Commissioner (A) to rehear the application for dispensing with pre-deposit in accordance with law. The Court found that the Commissioner (A) failed to consider relevant material, violating principles of natural justice.